Global 3D Print Powder Market Industry Trends, Survey, Growth and Forecast

3D Print Powder Market

3D Print Powder Market

Company 1, Company 2, Company 3, Company 4, Company 5, Company 6, Company 7, Company 8, Company 9, Company 10 and more….. Detailed Analysis of the Major Market Players included in the Global 3D Print Powder market research report

QyResearchGroup has just Published a comprehensive analysis of 3D Print Powder Market. The report covers the present scenario (2012-2017) and the growth prospects (2018-2025) of the global 3D Print Powder market. The research report includes diverse topics like total market size, key market drivers, challenges, growth opportunities, technological changes, key players etc. of 3D Print Powder market. To calculate the market size, the report considers the 90-95% of the total addressable market (TAM) by the major players across the various segments.

Get Download FREE Sample Copy of Report@

This report provides detailed analysis of worldwide markets for 3D Print Powder from 2012-2017, and provides extensive market forecasts (2018-2025) by region/country and subsectors. It covers the volumes, prices, historical growth and future perspectives in the 3D Print Powder market and further lays out an analysis of the factors influencing the supply/demand for 3D Print Powder , and the opportunities/challenges faced by industry participants.

Segmentation on the basis of 3D Print Powder Market product type- Type I, Type II, Type III

Segmentation on the basis of 3D Print Powder application- Application 1, Application 2, Application 3

It also acts as an essential tool to companies active across the value chain and to the new entrants by enabling them to capitalize the opportunities and develop business strategies.

The report provides separate comprehensive analytics for the North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa and Rest of World for the top 5 countries in each region. In this sector, global competitive landscape and supply/demand pattern of 3D Print Powder industry has been provided.

The report answers key questions like the market size through 2012-2022 along with the respective growth rates for the various years. The report also studies the market trends for the key competitors and provides their market shares in terms of sales and revenue generated.
While forecasting the market and deriving the CAGR the analysts have taken into account the key market drivers, Macro and Micro economic factors, policy and regulatory changes and effect of company policies.

Make Enquiry to Get assembled report as your requirement@

Following queries are addressed in the document – Global 3D Print Powder Market

Detailed Overview of Global 3D Print Powder market helps deliver clients and businesses making strategies.
Influential factors that are thriving demand and constraints in the market.
What is the market concentration? Is it fragmented or highly concentrated?
What trends, challenges and barriers will impact the development and sizing of 3D Print Powder market?
SWOT Analysis of each key players mentioned along with its company profile with the help of Porter’s five forces tool mechanism to compliment the same.
What growth momentum or acceleration market carries during the forecast period?
Which region is going to tap highest market share in future?
What Application/end-user category or Product Type may see incremental growth prospects?
What would be the market share of key countries like United States, France, UK, Germany, Italy, Japan, China,Canada, Australia, India, Brazil etc.
What focused approach and constraints are holding the market tight?

About Us:

QYResearch Group is a single destination for all the industry, company and country reports. QYResearch Group also carries the capability to assist you with your customized market research requirements including in-depth market surveys, primary interviews, competitive landscaping, and company profiles. We feature large repository of latest industry reports, leading and niche company profiles, and market statistics.

Contact US:

Joel John
3422 SW 15 Street, Suit #8138,
Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442,
United States
Tel: +1-386-310-3803

3D Systems Looks to Increase 3D Printer Efficiency with Aquant's AI Platform

Pin It


For the last two years, 3D printing industry giant 3D Systems has been looking into product launches in hardware, materials, and workflow, in order to create more opportunities for additional applications. 3D Systems President and CEO Vyomesh Joshi (VJ) mentioned this strategy again at RAPID + TCT in Texas last month, and highlighted a few examples.

For instance, the company has been focused on applications in the medical and dental fields for a while, and both the US Air Force and the US Navy will be utilizing its technology to reproduce older plane components and qualify metal 3D printing for warships. 3D Systems also recently introduced a new metal 3D printing system, along with an integrated metal 3D printing software platform.

Never one to just sit back and rest on its laurels, 3D Systems rallied after disappointing Q3 17 financial results and outlined a fairly aggressive approach to keeping its market leadership position. In keeping with the plan, the company recently made its newest announcement – it’s chosen the Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform by New York-based Aquant to increase field service efficiency through parts prediction.

“Advanced technology is key to continued growth for our business. By applying Aquant’s AI technology to our service processes, we believe we are taking a major step towards the vision of providing our customers with zero unplanned downtime,” said Mark Hessinger, the Vice President of Services for 3D Systems.

Aquant, an enterprise AI platform, learns the unique language of other enterprises through machine learning, and uses this knowledge to increase equipment uptime – what it refers to as Uptime as a Service. Its machine learning can provide a step-by-step troubleshooting process, which allows its customers to make faster, smarter decisions, driven by hard data, by taking Aquant’s recommendations for “predictive actionable service.”

The company uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithms to quickly convert both historical unstructured and structured data into a helpful knowledge base. Aquant’s predictive AI can help elevate organizations by increasing first-time fixes on machines, which completely negates unplanned downtime.

Shahar Chen, Aquant’s CEO and Co-Founder, said, “We are honoured 3D Systems, one of the leading 3D printing companies in the world, has decided to partner with us. Our technology will allow 3D Systems to leverage all of the data they’ve gathered over the years to create an immediate improvement in speed and accuracy of issue diagnosis, achieve a significant increase in machine uptime, reduce operational costs and provide fast ROI.”

3D Systems will maximize its 3D printers’ uptime through Aquant’s innovative AI platform, which will allow the company to diagnose machine failures more accurately and quickly. Thanks to its increased productivity, 3D Systems will be able to save money by cutting out repeat service visits. In addition, Aquant analyzes historical item usage, so it’s better able to forecast any future demand.

According to the Aquant website, “Even the best experts cannot predict the exact parts and skills necessary to complete each job. In order to maximize machine uptime and increase first-time fix rate, Aquant’s machine learning algorithms predict which parts and skills are required for the job.”

The technicians at 3D Systems can call on Aquant’s technology to quickly diagnose 3D printer issues based on their report symptoms. In addition, the company will be able to better predict which parts will need service calls, escalate complex problems to the next level without delay. – basically letting Aquant take care of all of the heavy lifting.

It’s smart decisions like this – teaming up with Aquant to reduce 3D printer downtime – that keeps 3D Systems on top.

Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below.

SteelSeries' relentless pursuit of the best gaming accessories

Meet the IceMat, the very first SteelSeries product

If you don’t know SteelSeries, you’re either not a gamer or you haven’t been paying very close attention. The company is consistently behind some of our top-rated gaming accessories.

The company started out in Denmark with gaming mouse pads, with a glass pad called the Icemat as its first product way back in 2001. That was later followed up by a steel mouse pad that would ultimately lead to the companies name. To this day SteelSeries still makes a great mouse pad.

Eventually it expanded into more accessories. It has a keyboard ranked in our list of best gaming keyboards. It’s Rival 600 and Sensei 310 rank first and second, respectively, in our list of best gaming mice. And, it’s Arctis Pro and Arctis Pro Wireless each hold a spot in our picks for best gaming headsets.

For PC Gaming Week, we had a chance to head over to the US office of SteelSeries and chat with a few of the company’s key figures. There, we met with Jeff Mahlmeister, the Director of Product and Head of Product Management, as well as Ehtisham Rabbani, the company’s CEO. However, we got a special surprise when one of the founding members of SteelSeries from back in its Icemat days also joined us: Tino Soelberg, the CTO.

Meet the IceMat, the very first SteelSeries product


We’ve already mentioned that SteelSeries started up in 2001 making mouse pads in Denmark, with the first glass mousepad called the IceMat. In 2004, the company opened an office in Taipei, Taiwan, bringing it close to a lot of the vendors it works with.

For some products, like its cloth mousepads, it had to make them from the ground up, because vendors just weren’t set up to manufacture them to SteelSeries’ specifications. In those earlier years, as a small company, it focused on taking what was available and making a product gamers could use.

“That’s a lot of what we did, I would say, very early on,” Soelberg explains, “was taking a lot of the existing technology and then just repurposing it for gaming use.” This could be seen in the SteelSeries creation of the first mechanical gaming keyboard.

From there, the company continued to grow, making a name for itself in the esports space, as it’s products addressed the needs of gamers, and the company went out of its way to help esports players.

Rabbani recalls the company’s relationship with the esports scene in the early 2000s. “SteelSeries was founded to service esports professionals, right? So, back in 2005 when no other company really was looking at esports, SteelSeries was already providing gear to gamers and professional [players]. You know, helping them get to tournaments, because just affording a plane ticket to go to play in a big tournament, for some of these kids, was just too much.”

With roughly 160 people working for SteelSeries between its offices in Copenhagen, Chicago, and Taipei, the company is still small compared to competitors like Logitech. But, what the company is able to make has changed.

“Nowadays it’s a bit different,” Soelbeg tells us. SteelSeries has more financial muscle to take bold steps and design products from the ground up, like it did with the TrueMove sensors and its QS1, Qx1, and Qx2 mechanical switches.

So, with SteelSeries being able to design the products it wants, we wanted to find out more about how it does that, and what goes into making the best products gamers can buy.

Starting from the beginning

Asking how a new SteelSeries product starts out, Mahlmeister explains that there were a few ways the company might get the idea for a new product. One way starts with a simple question, Mahlmeister asks, “What’s the need in the space?” Or, they may look for something they might want to change about a product.

These questions might be answered by looking at gaming trends, what games players are into, suggestions from gamers on staff, or aspects of gaming players are struggling with. SteelSeries did this when they worked on introducing a gaming mouse with 1:1 tracking.

At the time, many mouse makers were focused on putting up big DPI/CPI numbers with their mice. But, SteelSeries got a different idea. Soelberg says, “If you look at the pros, right, it’s all 800, 400, at least the FPS guys.”

And, Jeff Mahlmeister talked about how what they were seeing was more pro players focusing on big arm movements and muscle memory.

So, the company dropped the CPI arms race and went to Pixart, a mouse sensor vendor, to make a custom sensor that would give 1:1 tracking at low latency and a high range of CPI settings.

Later on, they still could see pro players frustration when lifting up and setting down the mouse, as that could create undesired movements. “And that’s where the dual-sensor system in the [Rival] 600 came from,” Mahlmeister tells us.

The other way a product can come about is when a new technology arrives. “We have people in Taipei that are always evaluating like latest technology components,” Mahlmeister says, “so sometimes it’s like the reverse of like – look at this cool technology, we think it could be applicable.”

Once the ideas there, Mahlmeister says his team passes it on to Soelberg’s team. “They would take our gross requirements, if you will, and try to parse through what we’re actually looking for.”

From idea to product

Once the idea is with Soelberg’s team, they being the visual design and quickly move into 3D. Soelberg brings in one designer’s sketchbook for us to see along with a handful of 3D-printed models of gaming mice.

Soelberg explains that beyond these models, the team will sometimes use clay as well, while they’re working out the ergonomics of a product. They’re not afraid to make changes after the fact either, as he says they’ll sometimes take a dremel tool to their 3D-print models to alter aspects of them.

One thing that’s fairly consistent across the SteelSeries brand is a knack for subtlety. This can be attributed to the roots of the company in Danish design. CEO Rabbani explains Danish design to us plainly: “There’s beauty in simplicity.” He believes the designs should be timeless and elegant.

SteelSeries manages that elegance for each product, and even between product lines thanks to its in-house design team.

“We do all of our designs in-house,” Soelberg says. “Everything is done by a very small team in Copenhagen, which means that you get consistency, because it’s the same people. They have the same direction … as a team, we’ve worked together for many years, we kind of have the same thinking around design.”

While the team in Copenhagen hands the visual design. The teams in Chicago and Taipei are figuring out the technology. We are shown a large circuit board that had been used to figure out the dual-sensor system that went into the Rival 600. What we saw looked nothing like a mouse, but that experiment eventually led to the best mouse we’ve ever used.

This whole process might take 6 months to end up with a complete design and finished prototype. But that’s not the end. From there, the company still has to figure out how to mass produce it, which can take just as long. And all the while, there’s a chance something might not be quite right.

Learning from failure

We were definitely curious about what happens when something goes for SteelSeries. And, the folks we were talking to weren’t shy about failure.

“You need to fail a lot,” Soelberg said.

Soelberg and Mahlmeister tells us that they usually shoot to finish a product in about 12 months, but occasionally setbacks can stretch out that timeline. Mahlmeister tells us the reason they might delay a product.

“We definitely believe that our design is an intrinsic value to the consumer,” Mahlmeister says. “So we are willing to make sure that the end product does match the vision, even if that means development is delayed unfortunately”

He tells us sometimes those delays can extend the timeline to 18 months. He and Soelberg have a good laugh about the delays, seeming to suggest they aren’t all too uncommon. That makes us curious how Rabbani feels about these kinds of setbacks for the company he’s tasked with running.

Surprisingly, he doesn’t sweat it.

“The cost, being short-term minded, that way, to say, ‘look I’ve got a budget that I need to hit this quarter, if I don’t get this product, I’m not going to hit this budget’ – it’s the best way to destroy a brand,” he says of the decision to delay a product. “So, it’s a very easy decision.”

Sometimes a concept may be scrapped entirely. But even that isn’t necessarily the end. Some of the company’s ideas can come back years later. “And then you’ll have Tino [Soelberg] digging up old prototypes,” Mahlmeister teases. “It’s a good thing he saves them all.”

And what happens when the product is done?

SteelSeries doesn’t rest on its laurels. We can see that easily enough when we look at the two best gaming mice on the market, with the Rival 600 rising above everything accomplished with the Sensei 310.

Still, we have to pry a bit. With so many products that seem close to the peak of what they can be, we want to know where the company can go up from here.

“I mean, you’re asking the question that I struggle with everyday, right? That’s what makes our jobs hard,” Mahlmeister answers. Of course, he can’t quite answer with specific examples, as he later makes clear.

“TrueMove 3+ and the Rival 600?” Mahlmeister poises. “We think that’s the best on the market, bar none. How do we beat that? I don’t know – or maybe I know and I’m not telling you.”

But, as was the case between the TrueMove 3 and the TrueMove 3+ sensor, there’s always room for improvement. Rabbani explains, “I don’t believe the products are as good as they can be. I think there’s so much more room for improvement.”

Rabbani says with any product, any person, there are going to be pain points. When products launch, they get to see where their peripherals still have pain points. After seeing all the feedback, and maybe having a few drinks, the SteelSeries team can continue working to tackle those for gamers.

For Rabbani, there’s still so much ahead. He uses SteelSeries’ latest headsets as an example: “I personally believe we have the best headset on the market, and honestly we haven’t even gotten started yet.

  • TechRadar’s fourth annual PC Gaming Week is officially here, celebrating our passion with in-depth and exclusive coverage of PC gaming from every angle. Visit our PC Gaming Week 2018 page to see all of the coverage in one place

Smoothing PLA with Two Paints

There was a time when most 3D printers used ABS plastic. It stinks, is probably bad for you, and tends to warp unless printed in a heated enclosure. So most people have gone to something else, mostly PLA. But ABS also dissolves in a readily-available solvent, acetone, and this is useful for smoothing the layer artifacts from a 3D print. [3DSage] has a technique that works for PLA or — he says — probably any filament. You can see what he’s doing in the video below.

The video starts out with a recap of things most Hackaday readers will already know. But hang in there because at about 1:20, he reveals his method.

The technique involves using plastic-compatible paint and fast-drying polyurethane. He quickly sprays a thin coat of paint and then a thin coat of polyurethane on the part and uses a fan to rapidly dry the mixture before it can run. The two sprays merge to form a coating. He does apply several coats, leaving half an hour to dry between layers, and waits overnight before applying the final coat.

The results look pretty good. This is more like a coating than truly smoothing, but it does fill in the gaps and ridges nicely. As [3DSage] points out, you can print with a larger layer height, and you can change the final color by just changing paint colors.

It certainly looks easy enough to try out. A trip to a big box store and a fiver should put you in business. Our own [Donald Papp] has done something similar with UV resin. The paint method does seem safer than torching your prints.

[embedded content]